Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Media Frenzy

This was originally included in the post dedicated to Haiti, but on consideration I thought it might be nicer to keep my thoughts separate. So, here is the new post.

At times like this, I find I start to think about the global community. I mentioned in a previous post how, at certain times and in certain places it feels like people are divided more so, and more definitely, than they would be usually. It seems to be the complete opposite when disaster strikes; people bond at times like this.

It cannot very much be denied that we are a world driven by media. How things appear on TV, in cinema, on other animated media and in print is how we see things, and consequently how we tend to perceive real world situations. We apply our interpretation of people and situations in the public eye, to every day life.

I find it incredibly uplifting and inspiring seeing how the global community bands together to help a population in need, whether it be a town or a nation. When considering how many ongoing problems there are for other communities, such as poverty, it is interesting to see (and attempt to analyse) the different reactions from people.

It seems the shock factor has a lot to do with it. As soon as an unusual or unexpected disaster strikes a place or population, the globe is inundated with media networks trying to get the news out first, and draw the most viewers. Unfortunately, while ultimately it would be hoped that their first priority is spreading the word to gain as much support for victims as possible, it is all a business opportunity. I'm not saying that is necessarily a bad thing; people need to generate an income, and it is the media's job to inform people. It just so happens that large viewership benefits both the media and the people suffering.

It is with this in mind that I return to the shock factor, with regards to the ongoing problems. In relation to poverty, it is (unfortunately) a permanent situation, until such time if and when a solution can be found. This means it is lacking the shock factor. It is not new news to people, therefore the media see less opportunity in it, and consequently less information is spread and interest generated. The fight against poverty is an ongoing cause with many people constantly fighting for it; unfortunately this seems to be largely taken for granted by the majority of people.

It could also be, of course, that there are just too many problems in the world for people to be able to worry about each one. Unfortunately, that is most likely the case.

This may seem like I'm criticizing people, or the media, but I am not. I'm just putting forward the thoughts that entered my mind upon seeing the Haiti broadcast on the news, which made me think about the disasters that have occurred each year for the past few years. They seem to be becoming more common. Climate change??

Much to think about, and much for more fortunate people to be grateful for.

2 comments:

  1. Wow. This post actually really struck a chord in me. It makes alot of sense.

    I realised as i was reading that the same could be said of the war in Iraq, how it has lost shock factor, and hasn't been reported on as much lately.

    A very thought provoking post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment, and for bringing up the important point on Iraq; definitely a good example of the loss of shock factor. On that - it is re-introduced by the media as terrorist / suicide attacks occur, but as they become more common and more regular, people become desensitized and / or the interest is no longer there (and, yes, I guess a lot goes unreported now because of that). And that is sad. There are a lot of other examples too, unfortunately.
    Thanks again :)

    ReplyDelete